Back
By The tactical Lens
José Mourinho returned to El Clásico with a clear plan, and the result was a tactical contest that demonstrated why football is not always won by the team that has the ball the most.
Real Madrid defeated Barcelona 2–1 at the Spotify Camp Nou on 25 October 2026, with Kylian Mbappé scoring twice, including a dramatic late winner. Barcelona enjoyed more possession and produced more shots, but Mourinho's side showed greater efficiency, defensive organisation and composure in the decisive moments.
The question is: how did Madrid manage to frustrate Hansi Flick's team, control the important spaces in midfield and eventually take all three points?
Let's break down the tactics.
Mourinho started with a nominal 4-2-3-1 formation. Bernardo Silva and Aurélien Tchouaméni formed the double pivot, while Arda Güler, Jude Bellingham and Yan Diomande operated behind Kylian Mbappé.
However, Madrid's shape changed when Barcelona had possession.
Rather than allowing Barcelona to play freely through the middle, Madrid dropped into a compact defensive structure that often resembled a 4-4-2, with Bellingham supporting the midfield line and Mbappé remaining as an attacking outlet.
The idea was straightforward: protect the central areas, close the passing lanes and make it difficult for Barcelona's midfielders to receive the ball facing forward.
Bernardo Silva and Tchouaméni were important to this plan. Silva offered positional intelligence and an ability to read the game, while Tchouaméni provided physical presence, ball-winning ability and protection in front of the defence.
The wide players also had defensive responsibilities. Güler and Diomande helped Madrid maintain their compactness, making it harder for Barcelona to find easy combinations between the lines.
Madrid were not necessarily trying to win the possession battle. They were trying to win the battle for space.
One of the most interesting aspects of the match was the difference between possession and control.
Barcelona enjoyed more of the ball, but Madrid worked hard to prevent that possession from becoming dangerous in central areas.
Pedri and Rodri were important to Barcelona's attempts to build attacks, but Madrid's midfield structure made it difficult for them to find consistent forward passing options.
When Barcelona tried to progress through the centre, Madrid's midfielders narrowed the available spaces. When the ball went wide, the Madrid players shifted across to support their full-backs and prevent easy combinations.
This forced Barcelona to work harder for openings.
The result was a game in which Barcelona could circulate possession without always finding the penetration they wanted.
Madrid's defensive work also created an opportunity for their attacking players. With Mbappé and Bellingham capable of attacking space quickly, every turnover offered the possibility of a dangerous transition.
That was an important part of Mourinho's plan: defend with organisation, recover the ball and attack before Barcelona could restore their defensive shape.
Madrid took the lead in the 41st minute, and the move demonstrated the value of their attacking width.
Yan Diomande delivered the ball into the Barcelona penalty area. Gerard Martín attempted to clear it, but the ball struck Mbappé and deflected into the net.
It was a fortunate finish, but the attacking move that created the situation deserves attention.
Madrid had worked the ball towards the left side, where Diomande could deliver into the danger area. The forward movement created a situation in which Barcelona's defenders had to deal with both the cross and the Madrid attackers arriving in the box.
Mbappé's positioning put him in the path of the attempted clearance, and the deflection gave Madrid the advantage.
This is an important lesson in attacking football: not every goal comes from a perfectly executed final pass or finish. Sometimes, good positioning and sustained pressure create the conditions for a fortunate goal.
Madrid went into half-time leading 1–0.
Barcelona returned from the break with greater urgency.
They pushed Madrid deeper, increased their attacking pressure and began to find more opportunities around the Madrid penalty area.
The equaliser arrived in the 61st minute. Pedri produced an excellent forward pass to find Raphinha, who finished to make it 1–1.
It was a reminder that Barcelona still had the technical quality to break through Madrid's defensive organisation.
Frenkie de Jong was introduced for Fermín López in the 74th minute. His arrival gave Barcelona another midfielder capable of receiving under pressure, carrying the ball and helping the team progress through midfield.
With Pedri and Rodri also involved, Barcelona had more options to circulate the ball and dictate the rhythm.
This created a difficult period for Madrid. Their midfield had to cover more ground, and Barcelona were becoming increasingly dangerous.
The substitution was significant because it gave Barcelona another natural controller in the middle of the pitch. However, greater control of possession did not automatically guarantee a winning goal.
Madrid still had a way to respond.
In the 80th minute, Mourinho replaced Bernardo Silva with Eduardo Camavinga.
The change brought fresh energy and mobility into Madrid's midfield at a moment when Barcelona were pushing hard.
Camavinga offered the ability to carry the ball, cover ground and contribute defensively. His introduction helped Madrid deal with Barcelona's increased intensity while retaining a threat when possession was recovered.
Bellingham's positioning also became important. Rather than remaining permanently in an advanced role, he could drop deeper to help protect the midfield and support the team as Madrid tried to see out the match.
This was not simply a case of Mourinho bringing on another midfielder and hoping for the best. It was about responding to the physical and tactical demands of the final stages.
Madrid needed to survive Barcelona's pressure, but they also needed to remain dangerous enough to punish any space left behind.
And that opportunity eventually arrived.
The decisive moment came in the 87th minute.
Madrid launched a rapid attacking move that began with Jude Bellingham producing a brilliant roulette to escape pressure.
He then connected with Arda Güler, who helped move the attack forward. Camavinga continued the move, got beyond Pau Cubarsí and delivered the decisive pass into the penalty area.
Mbappé was in the right position to finish and put Madrid ahead for the second time.
This goal was different from the opening one. The first had come through a cross and a fortunate deflection. The second was a moment of individual quality, combination play and intelligent movement.
Bellingham's ability to escape pressure was crucial. Güler helped connect the attack, Camavinga supplied the decisive contribution, and Mbappé completed the move.
It was a goal that highlighted the attacking quality Mourinho had available even while his team was under pressure.
Madrid had defended, adjusted and then found the decisive opening.
Barcelona finished the match with more possession and more attempts at goal, but Madrid left the Camp Nou with the victory.
That is what makes this Clásico particularly interesting from a tactical perspective.
Mourinho's team did not need to dominate the ball to compete. They needed to protect the most dangerous spaces, remain disciplined and take advantage of the opportunities that appeared.
Flick's Barcelona had periods of pressure, especially after the equaliser, but Madrid found a way to withstand that pressure and produce the decisive attack.
The match also showed the importance of substitutions. De Jong helped Barcelona improve their midfield control, while Camavinga gave Madrid fresh energy and eventually played a direct role in the winning goal.
Mourinho did not win this game simply because Barcelona had more possession. He won because his team remained organised, adapted to the changing demands of the match and made the most of its decisive moments.
José Mourinho's Real Madrid won El Clásico 2–1 because they combined defensive discipline with the ability to attack quickly and effectively.
Barcelona had the ball, but Madrid protected the centre. Barcelona increased their pressure, but Madrid found a response. And when the decisive opportunity arrived, Bellingham, Güler, Camavinga and Mbappé delivered.
For Hansi Flick, it was a painful defeat and a reminder that possession must lead to penetration and clear chances.
For Mourinho, it was a statement victory.
The biggest lesson from this Clásico? You do not always have to control the ball to control the game. Sometimes, controlling the spaces is enough.
What do you think was the biggest difference between the two teams: Mourinho's defensive organization or Madrid's ability to exploit space in transition? Share your opinion in the comments.
The tactical Lens — Understanding the game beyond the pitch. @Elclassico, @Laligafootball
Back
Top
| Privacy Statement Terms of Service Contact |
Refresh
|
All the best breaking news stories from Apex Scores Lite. Optimised for feature phones and low end Android devices, Apex Scores Lite helps users with legacy devices and poor network connectivity access the latest football news and live scores. Particularly relevant for breaking football news in Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa.