Apex Scores Lite Apex Scores Lite flag
back Back
Chargers Had Trade Deadline Options Like 49ers for Khalil Mack

The Chargers could have moved Khalil Mack at the trade deadline. But were the offers enough?

Khalil Mack | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

The Los Angeles Chargers sent some odd messages to fans at the NFL trade deadline. 

On the topic of Khalil Mack, the Chargers remained true and didn’t move him, seemingly aligning with his wishes on the matter. 

But the Chargers did go out and trade away Daiyan Henley, one of the core locker room leaders and prominent personalities on the team only outmatched by the likes of Derwin James. 

Not trading obvious candidates to move while rebuilding, but sending away a 50-50 to stay player seemed to align with the wishy-washy stance of general manager Joe Hortiz and the front office overall. It just creates even more questions about how they attack change next offseason. 

For now, though? We know the Chargers certainly had offers on the table for Mack. 

Chargers’ Khalil Mack trade call revealed

Khalil Mack | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Presumably, the Chargers had more than a few deadline offers for Mack, no matter what their public posturing through leaks and otherwise said. 

One team with interest was the San Francisco 49ers, according to Steven Haglund of the GAC Podcast. 

Should the Chargers have fired off a trade? Such a move would’ve kept Mack somewhat local and let him go play for a 7-1 contender. 

That was the crux of the discussion for Chargers fans, really. Mack pondered retirement last offseason before coming back on his latest one year $18 million fully guaranteed contract. If this is his last season, most Chargers fans would have agreed that shipping him off and letting him get a chance at a title was the right thing to do. 

However…those same fans would probably agree that if Mack wished to stay with the winless Chargers no matter what, they should probably honor that, too. There are things outside of football that are important to players, believe it or not. 

The Chargers were in a no-win spot here (pun intended, sorry). They were never going to get a good return for Mack. They have no wins and no leverage. If they traded Mack for a sixth-round pick or something, they would've been lambasted for trading away a future Hall of Famer for peanuts. 

Instead, they continue to clutch that Hall of Famer on an 0-8 team while whittling away the locker room leadership around him. He’s not under contract for next season, nor is anything about the Chargers, including the entire coaching staff, guaranteed for next season, either. 

All Chargers fans can do, really, is enjoy watching Mack do his thing over the back half of the season and hope this is a sign that he comes back in some capacity for one more go next year, no matter what the coaching staff looks like. 

You may like

Gimme Him: Jaxon Smith-Njigba would give Raiders a true No. 1 receiver

aol.com 1 hour ago

Vikings working OT to get QB Kirk Cousins ready for Packers

aol.com 35 minutes ago

Tom Brady's NFL Power Rankings: Was Bills' Win Convincing Enough To Move To No. 1?

foxsports.com 1 hour ago

Michael Penix Jr. Struggles for Second-Straight Week in Loss to Bengals

aol.com 1 hour ago

Rams star Puka Nacua out for an 'extended period' after suffering injury on final play of win

foxnews.com 1 hour ago

NFL Week 10 injury report: Mike Evans still not practicing, Puka Nacua facing multi-week absence

cbssports.com 1 hour ago

Chris Boswell Tops the 3 Best Kicker Streamers in Week 10 Fantasy Football

si.com 1 hour ago

Patrick Mahomes expected to play as Chiefs face Falcons

aol.com 1 hour ago

Saints Stock Up: Audric Estimé Makes a Statement, Pass Rush Keeps Rolling

si.com 1 hour ago